Search Results

In today’s fast-paced world, multitasking is often seen as a badge of efficiency, a way to juggle multiple tasks and make the most of one’s time. It is common in the workplace, and even in personal life. It is often glorified as an effective way of handling more than one task simultaneously. But when observed carefully, one finds that it comes with many downsides that are usually overlooked. Judged from that perspective, I feel that multitasking should be a choice and not an imposition. The following are some of the darker sides of multitasking that one should take into consideration before trying to jump the bandwagon, in an attempt to feel like a ‘superhuman’, and enjoy the glorification that comes with it. 1. Cognitive Overload While multitasking, individuals may not have the chance to fully engage with any one task at a time. This is because our brains are not designed to process multiple complex tasks at the same time. David Meyer, Jeffrey Evans, and Joshua Rubinstein in their 2001 study titled  “Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching” found that when we attempt to multitask, we actually switch back and forth between tasks, rather than performing them simultaneously .  We become prone to feeling disorganised, making more mistakes, or failing to complete tasks properly. 2. The Impact on Work Quality Multitasking often results in lower quality of work done. Constantly switching between tasks prevents the brain from concentrating deeply on any one of them, and giving them the time and focus they deserve. So, if you are preparing a presentation while also dictating a letter to your assistant and checking emails in between, none of the tasks is likely to be done as well as it could have been if given full and singular attention. Undivided attention is particularly crucial for tasks that require creative or critical thinking. 3. Increased Stress and Mental Health Concerns Being forced to multitask can increase stress levels and take a toll on mental health. When people are pressured to handle several tasks at once, it can lead to feelings of being overwhelmed, anxious, or burned out. Multitasking often triggers the release of stress hormones such as cortisol, which can have long-term negative effects on our physical and mental well-being. 4. Decreased Efficiency Research has shown that switching between tasks takes up more time than simply focusing on one task at a time. Each time we switch, our brain needs time to ‘reset’, which leads to lost time and productivity. For instance, David Meyer, in his study, found out that the time lost while multitasking ranges from 25% on simple tasks to more than 100% on complex tasks. Hence, contrary to popular belief, multitasking actually leads to decreased efficiency. 5. Maintaining Work-Life Balance Multitasking often results in blurring the lines between professional and personal time. With the rise of technology, it is easier than ever for work to bleed into personal life, be it answering emails on weekends, answering queries on phone outside of office hours or keeping awake at home to complete a presentation. Being required to multitask can create a constant sense of urgency and pressure, making it difficult to disconnect and recharge. 6. Frustration and disengagement   Imposing multitasking can lead to frustration, feelings of being micromanaged, and disengagement. It takes away the individual’s ability to manage their own time and work in a way that suits their strengths and preferences. Multitasking as a CHOICE Every individual has different cognitive strengths and work styles. Some people may feel comfortable multitasking, some may even like doing it, while others may find it stressful and counterproductive. Imposing multitasking on everyone, without considering personal preferences, can lead to frustration, inefficiency, and lower morale. By giving people the option to multitask, organisations and individuals can tailor their work habits to what suits them best. Those who love to multitask, can take on several projects, while others can focus on fewer tasks at a time, ensuring that work is completed to the best of everyone’s ability.   Those who multitask by choice, are often able to focus on one task at a time when needed, even while engaged in multiple tasks. This leads to a higher standard of performance and better work quality. Allowing multitasking to be a choice fosters a sense of empowerment and autonomy. When people are trusted to manage their own workloads, they feel more in control and motivated. Autonomy is one of the key drivers of job satisfaction and productivity. People who can decide when and how to multitask are more likely to feel confident and engaged with their work. They can also choose when to step back and take breaks to recharge, leading to better mental health and a more balanced approach to work. When multitasking is voluntary, individuals are better equipped to assess which tasks can realistically be combined and which should be done sequentially. This allows them to organise their time effectively and complete tasks more efficiently. After all, the goal is not always to do more at once, but to do the tasks with greater focus and less wasted effort. Conclusion In a world that increasingly demands efficiency and speed, multitasking has become a go-to strategy for getting things done, be it in office, or in our personal lives. However, its drawbacks, including cognitive overload, reduced quality of work, increased stress, and diminished efficiency, cannot be ignored. Multitasking should definitely not be a mandatory practice; rather, it should be a choice. When given the freedom to decide whether to multitask or not, and if yes, when to multitask, individuals can manage their work in a way that maximises focus, quality, and mental well-being. By empowering people to decide if, how and when they multitask, we can create a more productive, sustainable, and healthier work environment that respects individual needs and preferences. #multitasking #cognitiveoverload #choice #mentalhealth #worklifebalance

Work-related stress is a common reality for many parents balancing careers, financial responsibilities, and family life. Long hours, job insecurity, workplace conflicts, and demanding workloads can create high levels of stress that don’t simply stay at the office. Often, these pressures spill over into home life, affecting not only parents but also their children. Research shows that when parents are stressed by work, their children may experience emotional, behavioural, and even physical consequences. Understanding the ripple effect of work-related stress can help parents take proactive steps to create a healthier balance between professional and family life. In the following paragraphs, we will explore the effects of parents’ work-related stress on the emotional and psychological, behavioural and social, and the physical health of their kids. Emotional and Psychological Impact Work-related stress can deeply affect a child’s emotional and psychological well-being. Parents often unintentionally transfer their feelings of frustration, anxiety, and exhaustion to their children, either through their actions or emotional states. Children, particularly those who are young, may struggle to understand why their parents are acting in certain ways, leading to confusion and fear. The following are some emotional and psychological impacts of parents’ stress on their children: 1. Increased Anxiety and Emotional Distress Children are highly perceptive and can sense when their parents are overwhelmed or frustrated. When work-related stress leads to frequent irritability, emotional exhaustion, or disengagement; children may internalise these negative emotions. Studies have found that children of highly stressed parents are more likely to experience anxiety, sadness, and insecurity, even if the stress is not directly communicated to them. 2. Parent-Child Relationship Struggles Work stress often leaves parents mentally drained, making it harder to engage in quality time with their children. When parents are preoccupied with work, whether through physical absence or emotional unavailability, children may feel neglected or unimportant. This can lead to behavioural issues, as children may act out to gain attention or struggle with feelings of rejection. 3. Negative Emotional Modelling Children learn how to cope with challenges by observing their parents. If parents handle work stress with frustration, anger, or avoidance, children may adopt similar coping mechanisms. Over time, this can affect how they handle their own stressors in school, friendships, and personal challenges. Behavioural and Social Consequences Children who experience parental work stress may exhibit changes in their behaviour and social interactions. They may become more withdrawn, struggle to engage in peer relationships, or act out at school and home. This can stem from feeling neglected or not receiving the attention they need. The following are some of the behavioural and social impacts of parents’ stress on children: 1. Increased Irritability and Acting Out Children who experience parental stress at home may become more irritable, defiant, or withdrawn. Some children respond to the tension by acting out through tantrums, aggression, or disobedience, while others may become overly quiet and reserved. These behavioural changes can extend into school life, affecting academic performance and peer relationships. 2. Struggles with Academic Performance When parents are frequently stressed or unavailable due to work, children may receive less academic support and guidance at home. The emotional strain can also make it harder for children to concentrate, complete assignments, or stay motivated in school. In some cases, work-related stress can lead to inconsistent parenting—such as setting unrealistic expectations or being overly permissive—further affecting a child's learning habits. 3. Increased Dependence on Digital Distractions Parents dealing with work stress may unknowingly rely on screens and digital devices as a way to keep their children occupied while they decompress. While occasional screen time is not harmful, excessive reliance on technology for emotional comfort can lead to reduced face-to-face interactions and hinder a child’s social development. Physical Health Effects on children The physical health of children can also be impacted by the stress their parents experience at work. Stress can manifest in children through various physical symptoms. Chronic stress can impair a child's immune system, making them more vulnerable to illnesses. Research shows that children in high-stress households often experience the following: 1. Sleep Disruptions Stress in the household can create an atmosphere of tension that affects children’s ability to sleep well. If parents frequently come home from work frustrated or exhausted, children may struggle with bedtime routines, have difficulty falling asleep, or experience nightmares. Poor sleep can lead to increased irritability, concentration issues, and weakened immunity. 2. Increased Risk of Health Issues Research suggests that chronic stress exposure—even indirectly—can affect children’s physical health. Children of highly stressed parents may experience higher levels of cortisol (the stress hormone), which has been linked to digestive issues, headaches, weakened immune function, and increased susceptibility to illness. 3. Unhealthy Eating Habits When work stress leads to emotional exhaustion, parents may struggle to maintain healthy eating habits for the family. Fast food, skipped meals, or emotional eating can become more common, influencing children’s nutritional choices and overall health. Breaking the Cycle: How Parents Can Reduce Work Stress for a Healthier Home While work stress is unavoidable at times, parents can take proactive steps to minimise its impact on their children. Here are some strategies: 1. Set Boundaries Between Work and Family Life Where possible, establish clear work-life boundaries. Avoid bringing work-related frustrations home, and dedicate specific times for family interactions without distractions from phones or emails. Even small gestures, such as engaging in dinner conversations or reading a bedtime story, can create emotional security for children. 2. Practice Stress-Reduction Techniques Managing stress in healthy ways can set a positive example for children. Exercise, meditation, deep breathing, and hobbies can help parents release tension in a constructive manner. Taking care of mental well-being not only benefits parents but also fosters a calmer and more supportive home environment. 3. Communicate Openly with Children If work stress is affecting your mood or availability, communicate with your children in an age-appropriate way. Reassure them that your stress is not their fault and encourage them to express their feelings as well. Maintaining open and honest discussions can help children feel heard and understood. 4. Prioritise Quality Time Even if work is demanding, prioritising moments of connection with children can counterbalance the effects of stress. Simple activities such as playing a game, taking a walk, or sharing a meal can strengthen bonds and help children feel valued. 5. Seek Support When Needed If work-related stress is significantly affecting family life, seeking external support—whether from a partner, friend, therapist, or support group—can be beneficial. Managing stress effectively ensures a healthier environment for both parents and children. Conclusion Work-related stress is a reality for many parents, but its impact extends far beyond the workplace. The emotional, behavioural, and physical effects on children highlight the importance of managing stress proactively. By setting healthy boundaries, prioritising family time, and practising stress-management techniques, parents can create a more stable and supportive home environment. The way parents handle work stress not only affects their own well-being but also shapes how their children perceive and respond to challenges in their own lives. Taking small, mindful steps to reduce stress can create a positive ripple effect that benefits the entire family. #stress #stressmanagement #rippleeffect #children #behavioural #qualitytime #stressreduction #worklifebalance #health

In an era dominated by digital connectivity, the boundaries between work and personal life have become increasingly blurred. Employees often find themselves responding to emails, attending virtual meetings, and handling work-related tasks outside of traditional working hours. This has led to increased stress, burnout, and a diminished work-life balance. In response, the concept of the ‘right to disconnect’ has gained momentum, advocating for employees’ ability to disengage from work communications outside official hours without the fear of reprisal. Understanding the Right to Disconnect The right to disconnect refers to employees’ ability to refrain from work-related communications, such as emails, calls, and messages, during their non-working hours. This right is designed to ensure that employees can enjoy their personal time without the expectation of being available for work at all times. Various countries and organizations have begun implementing policies and legislation to safeguard this right and promote a healthier work environment. Need for Right to Disconnect The need for the right to disconnect arises from several factors, including: Workplace Burnout : The inability to separate work from personal life contributes to mental exhaustion, stress, and decreased productivity. Mental Health Concerns : Constant connectivity can lead to anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. Blurred Work-Life Boundaries : Remote and hybrid work models have made it difficult to establish clear distinctions between work and home life. Employee Satisfaction and Retention : Providing employees with the right to disconnect can improve job satisfaction and reduce turnover rates. Global Perspectives on the Right to Disconnect Many countries of the world have recognized the importance of the right to disconnect and have enacted legislation to protect workers: France In 2017, France became the first country in the world to introduce the concept of Right to Disconnect through the ‘El Khomri Law’ (also called ‘Loi Travail’ meaning ‘Work Law’). French companies with more than 50 employees are required to establish policies defining the use of digital tools after work hours to protect work-life balance after negotiation with the employees or their unions. Based on the agreement, employees shall have the right to ignore work-related emails after hours. This law was designed to combat the increasing encroachment of work on personal life and ensure that employees are not penalized for disconnecting. Spain In 2018 the Spanish government implemented the Data Protection and Digital Rights Law which includes the right to disconnect. It ensures digital disconnection outside of work hours, particularly focusing on remote work policies. The laws require employers to establish agreements that respect employees' rights to disconnect from digital devices when off duty with a view to ensuring work-life balance. The legislation aims to prevent burnout and excessive work demands, particularly in a culture where long working hours have historically been the norm. Italy Italian Smart Working Law implemented in 2017 include provisions to safeguard employees’ rights to disconnect, especially for remote workers. The regulations provide employees with the legal right to determine their own working hours and ensure they are not obligated to respond to work-related messages outside of contractual hours. These laws aim to balance productivity with mental well-being and encourage clear agreements between employers and workers regarding availability. Ireland In 2021, Ireland introduced a Code of Practice emphasizing employees’ rights to disengage from work communications after hours. The Code of Practice states that employees should not be penalized for not engaging in work-related communications outside their working hours and encourages employers to establish clear guidelines. Although not legally binding, this framework supports a cultural shift towards respecting employees' personal time. Belgium Belgium implemented the right to disconnect in 2022, granting federal employees the ability to disconnect from work-related communications outside of working hours. Employers are required to establish policies to ensure that work-related communication does not take place beyond designated working hours. Portugal Portugal introduced its Remote Work Law in 2021, which prohibits employers from contacting remote workers outside of their scheduled hours. If employers violate this law, they may face penalties. This measure aims to protect remote employees from excessive work demands beyond their agreed working time. Argentina Argentina enacted the Teleworking Law in 2021, ensuring that employees working remotely have the right to disconnect. Under this law, employees cannot be punished for refusing to answer work messages after working hours, reinforcing the importance of maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Canada (Quebec & Ontario) In Canada, the provinces of Quebec and Ontario established legal protections for the right to disconnect in 2023 through Ontario’s Working for Workers Act. The law requires employers with 25 or more employees to create a written policy on disconnecting from work. By formalizing this requirement, the law aims to ensure employees have clear boundaries between their work and personal lives. Australia In Australia, discussions around the right to disconnect have gained traction, particularly with the rise of remote work. While no formal federal legislation currently exists, certain states and industries have implemented guidelines encouraging work-life balance. The Fair Work Commission has been reviewing policies related to workplace communication outside of hours, and unions have been advocating for clearer protections for employees. In 2023, Victoria proposed a bill supporting the right to disconnect. Germany There are no specific laws on right to disconnect, but some companies voluntarily limit after-hours communication. The courts have also ruled in favour of workers' rights in cases of excessive work-related communication outside working hours. United Kingdom There are no specific laws, but some employers implement voluntary policies. Flexible working arrangements and mental health policies address work-life balance. United States There is no federal law on the right to disconnect as of now. However, some companies offer policies, but it’s mostly employer-dependent. Right to Disconnect in India India currently does not have a nationwide law guaranteeing employees the right to disconnect. However, there have been discussions and proposals regarding this issue. In 2019, a private member's bill called the Right to Disconnect Bill was introduced in Parliament by MP Supriya Sule. The bill aimed at providing employees with the right to ignore work-related calls and emails outside of working hours. It also proposed that companies (with 10+ employees) establish a charter on working hours and after-hours communication policies. However, the bill was not passed, and no further progress has been made on this front since then. Current Scenario in India The Indian corporate sector, especially the IT companies often have flexible work policies, but employees may still be expected to be available after hours. Some multinational companies operating in India follow global right-to-disconnect policies, but this is not widespread. The Indian labour laws, such as the Factories Act, 1948 and the Shops and Establishments Act, set limits on working hours but do not address after-hours communication. Work Culture Challenges Many Indian professionals, especially in IT, consulting, and banking, experience long working hours and on-call expectations due to global clients. The rise of remote work and hybrid work models has further blurred the lines between work and personal life. Despite discussions, enforcement of work-life balance remains largely dependent on individual employers.   Challenges of implementation While the right to disconnect is essential for maintaining work-life balance, its implementation comes with challenges: Enforcement Difficulties : Monitoring compliance can be complex, especially in global organizations with varying work cultures. Flexibility vs. Rigidity : Some employees prefer flexible schedules, and strict disconnection rules may not always be beneficial. Cultural Differences : Work expectations differ across industries and regions, making uniform application challenging. Conclusion The right to disconnect is crucial in fostering a healthier, more balanced approach to work in the digital age. As more organizations and governments recognize its significance, efforts must be made to ensure that employees can truly enjoy their personal time without the pressures of constant connectivity. By implementing effective policies and cultural shifts, both employers and employees can benefit from a more sustainable work environment. #worklife #righttodisconnect #workhours #labourlaw

Success is often perceived in different ways—some attribute it to hard work, persistence, and strategy, while others dismiss it as mere luck. Many successful people appear lucky to others after they succeed. People ignore the years of struggle, failure, and effort behind the scenes. However, there is no denying that the idea of pure luck is comforting, as it allows people to explain away failures. But, when we consistently view others’ achievements as the result of sheer fortune, we unknowingly create a mental barrier that obstructs our own personal growth. This mindset can be detrimental in several ways.   Overestimating Luck and Underestimating Effort This article is about how people overestimate luck and underestimate effort and how this adversely impacts our own growth. The following common ways in which people perceive and react to others' success illustrate how these perceptions impact our own success: 1. Undermining Effort and Hard Work Assuming that someone’s success is purely a stroke of luck disregards the effort and dedication they put in. Behind every achievement, there are countless hours of hard work, discipline, and persistence. By focusing solely on luck, we risk becoming complacent, believing that effort does not yield results, which ultimately discourages us from striving for our own success. 2. Fostering a Victim Mentality Attributing others’ accomplishments to luck can lead us to believe that success is beyond our control. This fosters a victim mindset where we feel powerless to change our circumstances. Instead of taking responsibility for our own progress, we may end up blaming external factors, which hinders personal and professional development. 3. Preventing Learning from Others Successful individuals often follow specific habits, strategies, and mindsets that contribute to their achievements. If we dismiss their success as luck, we miss valuable opportunities to learn from their experiences. Instead of seeing them merely as fortunate individuals, we should analyse what they did differently and implement those lessons in our own journey to replicate their success. 4. Creating Jealousy Instead of Inspiration When we perceive someone’s success as undeserved luck, it can lead to envy and resentment rather than motivation. This negative energy can drain us emotionally and mentally, preventing us from focusing on our own aspirations. Conversely, seeing others’ achievements as a source of inspiration can push us to work harder and improve ourselves. 5. Reducing Resilience and Growth Mindset A fixed mindset assumes that success depends on uncontrollable factors like luck, whereas a growth mindset recognizes that progress comes through effort and learning. When we convince ourselves that success is purely random, we usually give up easily when faced with challenges—we do not develop resilience and persistence to these challenges.   The Reality of Success: A Blend of Hard Work and Opportunity While some people might encounter fortunate circumstances, it is their preparation and ability to take action that determines whether they succeed or not. In other words, success is rarely the result of luck alone. It is often a combination of the following factors: Hard Work  – Consistent effort and perseverance. Smart Decisions   – Making the right choices at key moments. Right inspiration   – Learning from successful individuals Resilience – Overcoming failures and learning from mistakes. Opportunities – Recognizing and seizing the right chances.   A More Productive Perspective: Taking Control of Success By focusing on what we can control, we empower ourselves to create success rather than waiting for it to happen. Instead of assuming that success is luck-based, we should adopt a proactive approach to learn from the strategies, habits, and decision-making processes of successful people. 1. Learning from Others’ Success Rather than seeing success as an outcome of external luck, we should analyse the specific factors that contributed to it. Asking the following questions can provide valuable insights: ✅  What habits or strategies did this person use to succeed? Did they follow a disciplined routine? Did they focus on continuous learning or skill-building? Did they take calculated risks at the right time? ✅  What can I learn from their journey? What obstacles did they overcome, and how? What choices helped them move forward? What sacrifices or trade-offs did they make? ✅  How can I apply similar principles in my life? How can I implement similar routines, habits, or mindsets? What changes can I make to improve my work ethic and decision-making? How can I create my own opportunities rather than waiting for luck? 2. From Passive Observer to Active Learner When we view success as purely luck-based, we become passive spectators—believing that we have little control over our own outcomes. But by adopting a growth mindset, we shift from passively admiring successful people to actively learning from them and applying those lessons in our own lives. So, instead of saying “She was just lucky. I’ll never have that opportunity”, we can adopt a proactive approach and say, “She made smart choices and worked hard. What can I do to improve my chances of success?”   Conclusion: Taking Charge of our Own Path By shifting our mindset from passive observers to active learners, we open ourselves to growth, improvement, and the possibility of achieving success through our own efforts. Recognizing that success is a blend of hard work, smart decisions, and sometimes fortunate circumstances, allows us to take charge of our own paths and strive for excellence. Success isn’t something that happens to you—it’s something you create. In the words of Samuel Goldwyn —   "The harder I work, the luckier I get."

Optimism, or the belief that good things will happen in the future and that challenges can be overcome, is a pleasant personality trait. But it’s not just a trait, it also has a powerful influence on our health, well-being, and even longevity. Numerous studies have been conducted in this area which have consistently shown that optimistic people tend to live longer, healthier lives than those with a more negative or pessimistic outlook. While genetics, lifestyle choices, and environment certainly play key roles in determining how long we live, our mindset, especially our level of optimism, can have a profound impact on our life span. Some research indicates that optimists may live 11-15% longer than pessimists, even when factors such as socioeconomic status, lifestyle habits, and chronic conditions are taken into account.   What is Optimism? It is the tendency to see the brighter side of things, to expect positive outcomes even in difficult situations. Optimists often view challenges as temporary and solvable; they believe that setbacks will eventually be overcome. On the other hand, pessimists always see the darker side of things, expect the worst in every difficult situation and view challenges as permanent and not solvable. Optimism is all about hope. An optimist doesn’t ignore problems or believe that problems do not exist. Rather, they maintain their confidence in their ability to cope with adversity, and always focus on potential positive outcomes. The Science Behind Optimism and Longevity As already stated, the link between optimism and longevity has been supported by a growing body of scientific research. Here are some of the key ways that optimism influences health and life expectancy: 1. Reduced Risk of Chronic Diseases Optimistic individuals tend to have better cardiovascular health, lower blood pressure, and a reduced risk of developing chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Optimists are more likely to engage in healthy behaviours, like regular physical activity, eating nutritious foods, and seeking regular medical care. Optimism also helps reduce the impact of stress on the body, which is a known contributor to chronic conditions. (For example, a study published in JAMA Network Open  found that optimists had a significantly lower risk of developing heart disease compared to their more pessimistic counterparts.) 2. Strengthened Immune System A positive outlook can help boost the immune system, making it more effective at fighting off illnesses. Optimism has been linked to stronger immune responses, greater resistance to infections, and faster recovery times. Optimistic individuals tend to have lower levels of cortisol, a stress hormone that can weaken the immune system when chronically elevated. Further, a positive attitude can increase the production of antibodies and other immune system markers, enhancing the body’s defence against disease. To sum up, research has shown that optimists are less likely to get sick when exposed to viruses, and if they do fall ill, they tend to recover more quickly. 3. Better Stress Management Stress is known to accelerate aging by damaging cells and contributing to the development of diseases. Studies have revealed that optimists are better equipped to manage stress in healthy ways, reducing its long-term effects on the body. Optimists are more likely to cope with stress by taking proactive measures, such as problem-solving, social support, or relaxation techniques. They are also less likely to panic in difficult situations, which can increase stress and have negative effects on health. And as mentioned in the earlier point, optimists have lower levels of cortisol (the stress hormone), even in stressful situations, compared to pessimists. 4. Improved Mental Health Optimism is closely linked to better mental health outcomes, such as lower rates of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. People who are optimistic are more likely to engage in positive thinking, self-compassion, and resilience in the face of adversity. A positive mindset helps protect against the development of mood disorders, as optimists tend to focus on solutions and maintain a hopeful perspective. Further, optimism fosters resilience, which allows individuals to bounce back from difficult experiences and setbacks. 5. Longer Life Expectancy Perhaps the most compelling reason to be optimistic is its direct correlation with a longer life. Multiple studies have shown that optimistic individuals tend to live longer than those with a more negative outlook. As stated earlier, optimists tend to engage in healthier lifestyle habits, such as exercising regularly, eating well, and avoiding risky behaviours like smoking or excessive drinking. Further, their ability to maintain a positive outlook in the face of adversity also helps them navigate life’s challenges more effectively, leading to fewer health problems in the long run. (For example, in a study published by the National Academy of Sciences , researchers found that people with higher levels of optimism had a higher probability of living to 85 years or older compared to their pessimistic counterparts.)   Cultivating Optimism While some individuals are naturally more optimistic, others are not. But this is not a cause for concern. Optimism is a mindset that can be developed with practice. Here are some strategies to help nurture optimism: 1. Reframing Negative Thoughts: When faced with a setback or challenge, we must practice reframing our thoughts to focus on potential solutions and positive outcomes. Instead of thinking, “This will never work” or “This is the end of everything” we should try telling ourselves, “This is a challenge, but I can find a way through it.” 2. Practicing Gratitude: Gratitude has been shown to enhance optimism by helping our focus on what’s going well in our life. Keeping a gratitude journal or taking a few minutes each day to reflect on the positive aspects of our life is a good practice. 3. Surrounding ourselves with Positive People: The people we interact with can significantly influence our mindset. Surrounding ourselves with supportive, positive individuals who inspire us and encourage our growth can go a long way in helping us becoming more optimistic gradually. 4. Taking Care of our Body: Regular exercise, a balanced diet, and sufficient sleep can improve our physical and mental health, making it easier to maintain a positive outlook. 5. Engaging in Meaningful Activities: Engaging in activities that bring us joy and purpose, whether it’s a hobby, volunteering, or spending time with loved ones, can boost our overall well-being and help cultivate a more optimistic perspective. 6. Embracing a Life with Fewer Regrets: Regret can take a toll on our well-being, often stemming from unfulfilled passions, missed opportunities, career dissatisfaction, financial struggles, or lack of quality time with loved ones. While life’s demands may limit how much we can pursue these, making even small efforts to nurture our interests, build meaningful relationships, and work toward our goals can prevent regret from weighing us down. Ultimately, it’s not about how much we accomplish but about ensuring we don’t let regret take up space in our minds. This mindset fosters a happier life and a more optimistic outlook. Conclusion: Optimism as a Pathway to Longevity The connection between optimism and longevity is clear. Optimists tend to live longer, healthier lives. A positive outlook can strengthen the immune system, reduce stress, improve mental health, and promote healthier lifestyle choices, all of which contribute to a longer life. By adopting an optimistic mindset and incorporating strategies for cultivating positivity, we can not only enhance our well-being but also potentially add years to our life. So, let us embrace the power of optimism—it may be one of the most important choices we make for our health and longevity. #powerofoptimism #optimism #positivethoughts #longevity #mentalhealth #goodhealth #healthierlife #qualityoflife #optimist #pessimist

Modern life is fast-paced, leaving little time for reflection or relaxation. Many struggle to manage time effectively. Work, responsibilities, commuting, and digital distractions consume one's days, making time increasingly feel like a scarce resource. With endless to-do lists, the pressure to multitask and stay productive leads to stress and burnout. One often ends up wondering, “Where does my day go?” For those who feel like there is never enough time to get things done, a time audit might be a good solution. It is a systematic way to analyse how one spends one's time, identify inefficiencies, and make intentional changes to maximize productivity and satisfaction. This article walks one through the importance of a time audit, the procedure to conduct one, and using the audit results to improve one's life. Time Audit A time audit is a process of tracking and evaluating how one spends one's time over a certain period, typically a week. It is akin to a financial audit, but instead of money, one is accounting for hours and minutes. By conducting a time audit, one gains a clear picture of one's daily activities and how those align (or do not align) with one's priorities and goals. Why Conduct a Time Audit? Identifying Time Wasters:  Many small, unproductive activities—like excessive social media scrolling or unnecessary meetings—can eat away at one's day without one realizing it. Increasing Awareness:  By tracking one's activities, one becomes more mindful of how one's time is being used. Aligning Time with Priorities:  A time audit helps one see if one's actions reflect one's values and long-term goals. Boosting Productivity:  Once inefficiencies are spotted, one can reallocate time to high-value tasks, boosting productivity and reducing stress. Achieving Work-Life Balance:  A time audit highlights areas where one might be overworking or neglecting important personal or leisure activities. How to Conduct a Time Audit The following are the steps for conducting a time audit: 1. Choosing the Time Frame The audit starts with deciding how long one wants to track one's time. A week is ideal because it captures variations in daily routines, such as workdays versus weekends. 2. Using a Tracking Method Next, it is important to select a method that works best for one from the following: Manual Logs:  Using a notebook or a printed time log template. Digital Tools:   Apps like Toggl, Clockify, or RescueTime automatically track one's activities. Spreadsheets: One can also create a custom table to record activities and categorize time usage. 3. Recording Activities in Detail Tracking every activity, big or small, throughout the day is important during the time audit. One has to be specific, so instead of writing 'work,' it is better to note the exact task, e.g., 'writing a report,' 'preparing a presentation,' or 'attending a team meeting.' 4. Categorizing Activities One must group one's activities into categories, such as: Work-related tasks Family time (including family events such as marriages) Self-care (jogging, exercise, meditation, rest) Leisure (TV, social media, holidaying) Miscellaneous (commuting, errands) 5. Analyzing the Findings After tracking for the set period, it is time to review the data. The following questions are important to ask at this point: What consumes most of one's time? Is there a set pattern for activities? Are there recurring patterns of inefficiency? How much time does one spend on high-priority tasks versus low-value ones? Is one dedicating enough time to personal growth and relaxation? 6. Making Changes Based on the above findings, it is important to create an action plan to optimize one's time by: Eliminating or reducing time-wasting activities. Delegating tasks that do not require one's attention. Scheduling time for focused work on high-priority tasks. Setting boundaries for personal and work activities to prevent burnout. Conducting a Successful Time Audit For a successful time audit, one must give importance to the following: Being Honest:  One must track one's time accurately, even if it is uncomfortable to see how much time one spends procrastinating. Being Consistent:  It is important not to skip recording activities; incomplete data will give an inaccurate picture. Reviewing Periodically:  Time audits are not a one-time fix. One must conduct them periodically to ensure one's time management strategies remain effective. Adjusting Goals:  As life's circumstances and priorities change, one must update one's goals and allocation of time accordingly. The Benefits of a Time Audit Time is one's most valuable asset, and conducting a time audit is one of the best ways to ensure one is using it wisely. With a time audit, one is not just reclaiming wasted time but also creating a roadmap for a more intentional and fulfilling life. One realizes that even small adjustments, like limiting time on distractions or dedicating an hour to personal development, can have a significant impact on productivity and happiness. Finding balance requires prioritization, mindfulness, and intentional breaks to reclaim control over our schedule. So, let us take the first step today and discover where our time goes—we may be surprised by what we find.   #timeaudit #managetime #timemanagement #stress #burnout #audit #masteringtime #timetracking

In the intricate landscape of global economies, zombie companies have emerged as a significant concern. These businesses, which survive despite being economically unviable, are increasingly viewed as a drag on productivity, innovation, and market efficiency. While not a new phenomenon, the prevalence and impact of zombie companies, fueled by a variety of factors, have grown in recent years. Understanding the nature, causes, implications, and potential solutions to this issue is crucial for fostering robust and dynamic economies. In this article, I intend to do the same.   What Are Zombie Companies? A ‘zombie company’ refers to a business that continues to operate despite lacking the financial health to sustain itself independently. These companies exhibit the following distinct characteristics: Inability to Generate Profits : They struggle to cover interest payments or earn profits from core business operations. Reliance on External Funding : They depend on cheap credit, government bailouts, or other financial support to stay afloat. High Debt Levels : These companies often carry substantial debt, merely paying interest without reducing the principal. Stagnant or Declining Growth : Their revenue and market share either stagnate or decline as they fail to adapt to competition or market changes. Zombie companies are often kept alive artificially, with little incentive to innovate or restructure, because they are shielded from the consequences of failure. They tend to be in industries where competition is weak or government intervention is significant, making these businesses long-term liabilities.   Causes of the Zombie Company Phenomenon The rise of zombie companies can be attributed to several factors: Low Interest Rates:  Persistently low interest rates set by central banks have been a major driver. Cheap borrowing costs allow struggling businesses to roll over debt without making significant operational improvements, effectively enabling their survival. Government Bailouts and Support:  During economic crises, government interventions—such as those seen during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic—often aim to stabilize economies. While these measures protect jobs and prevent immediate economic collapse, they can inadvertently extend the lifespans of inefficient companies. Corporate Governance Failures:  Weak leadership and lack of accountability in zombie companies exacerbate the problem. Stakeholders often have little incentive to innovate or restructure, particularly when external financial support is readily available. Changes in Market Structure:  Industries facing disruption—whether from technological advancements or shifting consumer demands—can leave companies unable to adapt. These firms survive temporarily due to minimal competition or short-term revenue, but they ultimately stagnate without fundamental changes.   Implications for the economy The proliferation of zombie companies poses several risks to economic health and market dynamics: Resource Misallocation:  Zombie companies consume resources—capital, labour, and raw materials—that could be allocated to more productive ventures. This inefficiency hampers overall economic growth. Reduced Market Competition:  By surviving on external support, zombie companies weaken market dynamics. By maintaining market share through survival rather than innovation, superior products or excellence, they discourage new entrants and innovation Weakened Financial Stability:  These companies often have poor balance sheets and are highly vulnerable to economic downturns. They are more likely to default on their obligations during economic downturns, which can spread risks throughout the financial system, particularly if they are large or operate in critical sectors. Impact on Employment: While zombie companies may maintain jobs in the short term, they are unlikely to create new employment opportunities or improve working conditions. Furthermore, their long-term survival can make it harder for more dynamic companies to hire workers or scale operations, as the job market is crowded with inefficient firms that do not offer prospects for growth. Zombie Companies Around the World Zombie companies have become a global issue, with different regions facing varying degrees of the problem: JAPAN: A Persistent Problem Japan has faced a particularly persistent zombie company issue. The country's low interest rates, combined with an aging population and weak domestic demand, have led to a high concentration of inefficient, heavily indebted companies. According to some estimates, by 2020, over 10% of Japan's listed companies were classified as zombies. The government has implemented various programs to restructure these companies, but the problem remains entrenched. CHINA: An Emerging Threat In China, zombie companies have emerged in several state-owned sectors, particularly in heavy industries such as coal, steel, and construction. These companies are often kept afloat by local governments that prioritize job retention and social stability over economic efficiency. As China shifts toward a more market-driven economy, the government has recognized the need to address zombie companies, but the pace of reform has been slow. USA and EUROPE: Rising Post-Crisis In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, zombie companies have increased in number across the United States and Europe. Low interest rates and government relief packages allowed many struggling businesses to survive longer than they would have in a typical market cycle. However, this has led to concerns about the long-term viability of certain sectors, particularly in industries like retail and hospitality. INDIA: A continuing issue   India is not immune to the zombie company phenomenon. The issue has been particularly evident in sectors like steel, infrastructure, and power, where companies have struggled with high levels of debt and overcapacity. Non-performing assets (NPAs) in the banking sector have often been linked to these zombie firms, as banks continue to extend credit to avoid recognizing bad loans. Efforts by the Indian government, such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), aim to address this issue by expediting the resolution of insolvent companies and encouraging resource reallocation. However, challenges in implementation and resistance from stakeholders have slowed the progress so far. The problem highlights the need for stronger corporate governance and stricter financial discipline in India’s corporate sector.   Addressing the Zombie Company Problem Solving the zombie company issue requires a multifaceted approach: Tightening Credit Access:  One potential solution is to reduce the availability of cheap credit for struggling companies. This could involve raising interest rates or implementing stricter lending standards. However, this approach must be balanced to avoid triggering economic slowdowns, especially during periods of recovery. Restructuring and Insolvency Reform:  Improving insolvency laws and mechanisms could help facilitate the exit of inefficient firms. Expedited bankruptcy processes or debt restructuring programs can encourage companies to face the reality of their financial condition and allow their resources to be redeployed more effectively. Improved Corporate Governance:  Encouraging better corporate governance practices, such as regular performance reviews and restructuring efforts, could help prevent companies from falling into the zombie category. This would require stronger shareholder rights and mechanisms to hold management accountable for long-term strategic planning. Government Incentives for Innovation:  Governments can shift focus from bailouts to fostering innovation. Tax incentives for research and development, grants for startups, and support for entrepreneurial ecosystems can promote the growth of dynamic firms. Conclusion Zombie companies represent a complex and pressing issue in modern economies. While they may seem harmless at first, their long-term impact on productivity, competition, and financial stability can be profound. Addressing the zombie company problem requires a multifaceted approach, including reforms in credit access, insolvency laws, corporate governance, and innovation incentives. If left unchecked, zombie companies could become an ever-increasing burden on the global economy, undermining its potential for growth and development. As economies recover from the COVID-19 pandemic and other economic shocks, ensuring that zombie companies are not allowed to thrive unchecked will be critical for fostering healthy, dynamic markets that prioritize innovation and efficient resource allocation.

In a world that often feels driven by competition, it is easy to believe that success is a limited resource, like a pie with a specific number of slices. This mindset fosters jealousy, unnecessary rivalry, and the fear of losing out and lagging behind in the race. But the truth is, success is abundant—there’s enough to go around for everyone. Unlike many resources that are finite in nature, success is not finite. It is not something that one can take away from others when they achieve it themselves. Instead, it is an expansive resource that grows the more we tap into it. Another way of explaining the same concept is by saying that ‘success is not a race where only a few can win’. On the contrary, it is a boundless journey where everyone has the potential to thrive. When we compare ourselves to others, we risk overlooking our own progress, talents, and opportunities. Instead of getting frustrated at someone else’s success, we should think of it as a flame: lighting someone else’s candle doesn’t extinguish our own—it simply creates more light. This perspective is important in a collaborative world, and is especially applicable in the organisational context. When we uplift others, we do not diminish our own potential. On the contrary, collaboration often multiplies opportunities for success. Sharing ideas, resources, and encouragement can lead to collective achievements that benefit everyone involved. The key to embracing this abundance mindset is understanding that success looks different for everyone. For some, success lies in career advancement; for others, it is in personal growth, or in creative fulfilment, or in contributing to one’s community. Defining our own version of success, rather than comparing ourself to others, frees us from the scarcity mentality. Believing in abundance also requires shedding the fear of competition. It is so much important that we celebrate others’ wins—they’re proof that success is achievable. It is a reminder that our time to shine will also come when we stay focused and work toward our goals. We should rather use others’ success stories as inspiration, not as a measure of what we lack. By shifting our focus from scarcity to abundance, we are sure to find ourselves in a more positive, empowered state of mind. So, the next time one feels envious about someone successful, or doubtful about their own path, they must remember this: the supply of success is unlimited. There’s enough for all of us, and our peers, our family and even for generations to come. When we all succeed, the collective success makes the world a better place. Together, we can create a brighter, more abundant future for everyone. Let us embrace the abundance of success, and discover how powerful it is to share, inspire, and grow together.   #success #abundance #scarcityofsuccess #competition #stayingfocused #celebratesuccess

In an age dominated by convenience and ease, we tend to prioritize comfort above everything else. From smart home devices like Alexa, the voice-controlled assistant, streaming services and platforms like Netflix and Spotify, food delivery apps like Swiggy and Zomato, online shopping platforms like Flipkart and Amazon and grocery delivery apps like Blinkit and Zepto that deliver groceries to our doorstep, the modern world seems to be hell bent upon eliminating discomfort from our lives completely. But while comfort is desirable, the pursuit of it can stifle personal growth, creativity, and transformation. Discomfort, on the other hand, is a powerful catalyst for change—a necessary ingredient for personal and professional evolution. The Nature of Comfort Comfort is synonymous with stability and safety. It is the warm blanket on a cold winter night. It is the familiar routine that reassures us that everything is under control. Comfort offers a sense of security, and can make us complacent. When we are too comfortable, we are less likely to take risks, try new things, or confront the challenges that lead to growth. Discomfort as a Driver of Growth Growth rarely happens in the comfort zone. Whether it’s learning a new skill, adapting to a change in life, or overcoming adversity, progress often requires stepping into the unknown. Discomfort pushes us to face our fears, question our assumptions, and expand our capabilities. It is the tension of being stretched beyond our current limits that makes growth possible. For example, in case of physical fitness, building strength or endurance requires pushing through the discomfort of challenging workouts. Similarly, professional growth often demands embracing new responsibilities or tackling unfamiliar problems, learning new skills and often unlearning the old ones, all of which can initially feel intimidating or overwhelming. In both cases, the feeling of discomfort is not a sign of failure; it is evidence that progress is being made. The Neurological perspective From a neurological perspective, discomfort is said to activate the brain’s learning and adaptation mechanisms. When we encounter a challenge, our brain releases stress hormones like cortisol, which heighten focus and alertness. These physiological responses prime us to overcome obstacles and learn from the experience. Over time, repeated exposure to discomfort builds resilience, making us better equipped to handle future challenges. The Risks of Overvaluing Comfort While comfort provides temporary satisfaction, overvaluing it can lead to stagnation. A life lived entirely within the boundaries of comfort often results in missed opportunities and unrealized potential. People who avoid discomfort may stick to unfulfilling jobs, stay in unhealthy relationships, or resist pursuing their dreams because doing so feels too risky or uncertain. In course of time, this complacency leads to regret and a sense of unfulfillment and missed opportunities. Embracing Discomfort From the above discussion, it appears that one must embrace discomfort in order to grow. The key to leveraging discomfort for growth is to reframe how we perceive it. Instead of viewing discomfort as a negative experience to be avoided, we can see it as an opportunity for transformation. Here are a few strategies to embrace discomfort: Starting small : We must begin by stepping outside our comfort zone in manageable ways. This might involve trying a new hobby, initiating a difficult conversation, or volunteering for a challenging project at work. Shifting one’s mindset : We must view discomfort as a sign of being on the path to growth, and keep reminding ourselves that the uneasiness we feel is temporary and will lead to long-term benefits. Practicing resilience : We must build our capacity to handle discomfort by gradually exposing ourselves to challenging situations. Reflecting on growth : We must regularly reflect on moments when we embraced discomfort and grew as a result. This practice will reinforce the idea that discomfort leads to positive outcomes. Discomfort in a Broader Context On a societal level, discomfort drives progress. Social movements, scientific breakthroughs, and cultural shifts often arise from the willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and challenge the status quo. Without the courage to face discomfort, humanity would remain stuck in outdated systems and beliefs. Summing up Comfort, while alluring, is not the ultimate goal of life. True fulfilment comes from embracing discomfort and using it as a springboard for growth and change. By stepping out of our comfort zones, we can unlock new possibilities, develop resilience, and achieve our full potential. It is in discomfort that the strength and character of a person are tested. It teaches us patience, perseverance, and adaptability—qualities essential for navigating an unpredictable world. Moreover, the courage to face discomfort often inspires others to do the same, creating a ripple effect that drives collective progress. As individuals grow stronger, so too do communities, workplaces, and societies as a whole. So, the next time you encounter discomfort, view it not as an obstacle but as an opportunity. Lean into the challenge, trust the process, and embrace the transformation that awaits. The best version of yourself is just beyond the edge of your comfort zone.

The concepts of misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation have gained significant relevance in the digital age, particularly in the context of sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting. As companies navigate increasingly complex reporting standards and public scrutiny, distinguishing between these terms is essential for maintaining trust, ensuring transparency, and supporting global sustainability goals.   Defining Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation   Misinformation It refers to false or inaccurate information that is shared without any malicious intent. For example, a company might unintentionally misreport its carbon emissions due to errors in data collection or a lack of clarity in reporting frameworks. While the intent of the company is not to deceive, the resulting misinformation can mislead stakeholders, disrupt decision-making, and undermine confidence in the reporting process. Disinformation It means the deliberate spread of false information with the intent to deceive. In the realm of ESG reporting, this could manifest as an organisation intentionally overstating its sustainability achievements or greenwashing—presenting itself as more environmentally responsible than it truly is. Such practices not only damage reputations but also erode trust in ESG initiatives as a whole. Malinformation It refers to sharing accurate information in a way that results in causing harm. This could include selectively releasing data to damage a competitor’s reputation or exposing sensitive company practices that, while truthful, could incite public backlash or lead to regulatory action. In the ESG context, malinformation can polarize public opinion and derail constructive dialogue on sustainability challenges.   The Role of Misinformation in ESG Reporting As sustainability reporting becomes mainstream, organizations face challenges related to data accuracy and consistency. The increasing adoption of frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) aims to standardize disclosures, yet discrepancies remain. Misinformation may arise from: Data limitations:  Inaccurate or incomplete data from supply chains. Complex standards:  Misinterpretation of ESG metrics due to varying definitions across frameworks. Unverified claims:  Lack of third-party audits for reported achievements. Addressing misinformation in ESG reporting requires greater investment in robust data collection systems, clearer guidance on reporting frameworks, and independent verification processes.   The Threat of Disinformation in Sustainability Communications Disinformation poses a serious threat to the credibility of sustainability initiatives. For example, a company might claim it is achieving net-zero goals while continuing to invest in fossil fuel projects, hiding such actions through vague language or opaque reporting. This not only deceives investors but also jeopardizes efforts to combat climate change by creating a false sense of progress. Similarly, disinformation campaigns can be externally driven. Competitors, activists, or malicious actors may disseminate false claims about a company’s ESG performance, sowing distrust and confusion among stakeholders. The rise of social media amplifies these risks, making it easier for disinformation to spread rapidly. The Greenwashing Dilemma Greenwashing is one of the most prevalent forms of disinformation in the sustainability space. It occurs when companies exaggerate or fabricate their environmental or social achievements to appear more sustainable than they truly are. For example, an organisation might promote a product as ‘carbon-neutral’ while omitting the full lifecycle emissions or failing to disclose offset strategies. Greenwashing not only misleads investors, consumers, and other stakeholders but also undermines genuine sustainability efforts across industries. As public awareness of ESG issues grows, greenwashing can have severe reputational and legal consequences for companies. Combating greenwashing requires stricter regulatory oversight, greater transparency in disclosures, and a commitment to independently verify sustainability claims to ensure they reflect meaningful action rather than superficial marketing tactics.   Malinformation and Its Ethical Implications While malinformation is rooted in truth, the way information is shared can cause undue harm. For instance, exposing a company’s historical environmental violations during a period when it is actively transitioning to sustainable practices can undermine its ongoing efforts. This highlights the importance of context and responsible communication in ESG reporting. Malinformation also raises questions about data privacy and the ethical use of information. Companies must carefully balance transparency with safeguarding sensitive data to avoid unintentional harm.   Combatting Information Risks in ESG Reporting In the age of sustainability, combating misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation is crucial for building trust and advancing global ESG goals. Strategies to address these risks include the following: Enhanced Transparency: Organizations should disclose not only their successes but also their challenges and areas for improvement. Openly acknowledging limitations fosters trust and reduces the risk of accusations of disinformation. Independent Verification: Third-party audits and certifications add credibility to ESG claims, reducing the risk of misinformation and disinformation. Independent assessments ensure data accuracy and prevent greenwashing. Clear Communication: Simplifying complex ESG metrics and avoiding jargon helps stakeholders better understand reports. This minimizes the likelihood of misinterpretation and misinformation. Leveraging Technology: Blockchain and AI can improve data accuracy and traceability, ensuring that ESG information is reliable and resistant to manipulation. Proactive Crisis Management:  Companies should prepare for potential misinformation or disinformation campaigns by developing robust crisis response strategies. Timely rebuttals and clear communication are key to mitigating reputational damage.   Conclusion As the demand for corporate accountability grows, the risks posed by misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation in sustainability and ESG reporting cannot be ignored. Ensuring data integrity, enhancing transparency, and fostering ethical communication are critical for maintaining stakeholder trust and driving meaningful progress toward global sustainability goals. By addressing these challenges head-on, companies can contribute to a more informed and resilient ecosystem of sustainability reporting.    #misinformation #disinformation #malinformation #ESGreporting #ESG

In the digital age, boredom has become an endangered experience. Platforms like Netflix, Instagram and Facebook dominate our lives, filling every quiet moment with ‘entertainment’ or distraction. While these technologies offer connection and convenience, they’ve drastically altered our perception of time, our habits, and even our sense of self. The abundance of content available on Netflix and social media encourages us to consume more, faster, for fear of missing out (FOMO) on the next big thing. This leads to rushed consumption rather than savouring experiences, further distorting our perception of time. Social media and streaming platforms are designed to trigger dopamine releases through likes, notifications, and cliffhanger endings. This constant flood of rewards keeps us hooked, creating a ‘flow state’ where we lose track of time. While this is enjoyable in the moment, it contributes to the feeling of time slipping away unnoticed. How social media shortens our time Can you believe the COVID pandemic hit us almost 5 years back? Right, you didn’t realise how these 4+ years went past so fast. The sad truth is that platforms like Netflix and social media have blurred our sense of time, making days, months, and even years feel shorter. Autoplay features, binge-watching culture, and the addictive nature of scrolling compress our experience of time. Short-form content and ‘Reels’, fragments our attention further, creating a cycle of endless consumption that erodes the boundaries of our daily lives. Unfortunately, this constant engagement leads to fewer memorable moments. Without pauses to reflect or savour experiences, time feels like it’s slipping away. The pandemic only intensified this trend, as people turned to screens for comfort and escape, forming habits that persist, even today. In the Age of OTT platforms, time Has Lost Its Essence The advent of OTT platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney Plus Hotstar and other on-demand entertainment services has revolutionized the way we spend our time. With endless content available at our fingertips, the boundaries of time have blurred, making it increasingly difficult to measure our days in a meaningful way. In the past, entertainment was bound by schedules—TV shows aired at specific times, movies required a trip to the theatre, cricket matches were fewer and far between, games were in the fields and not in mobile apps and books demanded focused attention. These activities created natural markers in our days, giving structure to our time. Now, the ability to binge-watch entire season of a web series in one sitting has erased these boundaries. Days blur into nights as ‘just one more episode’ turns into hours lost in a haze of passive consumption. This shift has impacted our perception of time itself. The concept of ‘saving time’ has ironically led to its erosion. While streaming services offer convenience, they also encourage a kind of time slippage, where hours disappear without our conscious awareness. The immediate gratification of entertainment leaves little room for boredom, reflection, or the deliberate allocation of time to meaningful pursuits. Boredom: A Forgotten Necessity Before the rise of constant entertainment, boredom was a natural part of life. It gave our minds the space to rest, reflect, and create. Moments of stillness often led to bursts of creativity, problem-solving, and introspection, enriching both our personal growth and emotional resilience. Today, however, boredom is almost entirely avoided. Instead of embracing it, we reach for our phones, escaping into endless streams of content that leave little room for mindfulness or reflection. Advantages of boredom In a world filled with constant stimulation—smartphones, streaming platforms, and endless notifications—boredom is often viewed as something to avoid. I have been thinking about it, and researching a lot – implementing some changes in my life from time to time. Now, this is what I have realised – despite its reputation as an unpleasant emotion, boredom holds immense power, serving as a catalyst for creativity, reflection, and growth. It can have surprising benefits that indirectly contribute to a longer and healthier life. 1. Encourages Rest and Stress Reduction - Periods of boredom often signal the need to slow down and take a break from overstimulation. It allows one’s mind to wander or engage in low-energy activities reducing stress, which is a significant factor in preventing chronic illnesses like heart disease, high blood pressure, and anxiety disorders. Lower stress levels contribute to improved overall health and longevity. 2. Promotes Reflection and Mindfulness - Boredom provides a rare opportunity for self-reflection and mindfulness. When we’re not overwhelmed by constant activity or entertainment, we have time to process emotions, clarify goals, and evaluate our lives. This mental clarity fosters healthier decision-making, including choices about diet, exercise, and work-life balance—all of which can lengthen life expectancy. 3. Boosts Creativity and Problem-Solving - During periods of boredom, the brain enters a default mode network (DMN), where creative thinking thrives. This can lead to innovative solutions for personal and professional challenges, reducing unnecessary stress and enhancing life satisfaction. 4. Encourages Healthier Lifestyle Choices - When people experience boredom, they often seek new activities or challenges. This can motivate individuals to adopt healthier habits, such as learning new skills, picking up an exercise routine, or spending more time outdoors. Active engagement in meaningful hobbies is strongly associated with improved physical and mental health. 5. Builds Resilience and Adaptability - Learning to embrace boredom strengthens emotional resilience, helping individuals cope better with downtime or life’s inevitable lulls. Resilient people tend to handle stress and adversity more effectively, which can improve their overall health and lifespan. While boredom isn’t always pleasant, it can serve as a natural reset button, nudging us toward rest, creativity, and self-improvement. By reframing boredom as an opportunity, we can use it to enhance not just the quality of life but its duration. Also, one must not forget that   boredom create a unique space for inner thought and imagination. Studies show that when people experience boredom, their brains often enter a state of ‘daydreaming’, which can spark innovative ideas and problem-solving. Some of history’s greatest breakthroughs were born in moments of monotony, like Sir Isaac Newton theory of gravity which was developed after he observed a falling apple during a period of quiet contemplation. Embracing Boredom for Longevity Instead of viewing boredom as a void to fill, we can see it as a valuable opportunity—a chance to rest, move, reflect, and grow. By reducing our dependence on OTT platforms like Netflix and embracing moments of stillness, we can foster healthier habits and reclaim the essence of time, ultimately adding years to our lives. To reclaim the essence of time, we must limit screen time, prioritize hobbies and mindful activities, foster real-world connections, and embrace moments of stillness. In a world of endless streaming, it is entirely up to us to hit the PAUSE  button—not just on the content, but on the way, we let time slip through our fingers. When was the last time you felt bored and didn’t pick up your phone to overcome it? It is possible that you don’t remember. Here’s my 2 cents: the next time boredom strikes, resist the urge to escape it. Instead, lean into it. Let us elongate our lives by embracing boredom! #boredom #pandemic #hobbies #restbutton #netflix #ott

In recent years, the concept of non-human directors—entities that are not human but participate in corporate governance—has garnered attention in the evolving landscape of business management. While human directors have traditionally dominated boardrooms, the increasing role of technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, and other non-human systems, is challenging traditional governance models. These advancements could reshape how businesses are governed, but they also present new challenges and opportunities. The Rise of Non-Human Directors A non-human director is typically defined as an entity, whether AI-driven or robotic, that participates in decision-making processes of a corporate board. The involvement of such entities may not always equate to having full voting rights like human directors. Instead, they may serve in advisory roles, providing data-driven insights or performing analyses that human directors can use to make decisions. While no country has yet formally embraced non-human directors as legally binding members with decision-making power, the idea is not as far-fetched as it may seem. AI and Robotics in Corporate Governance Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics have found various applications in business, from automating processes to providing predictive analytics. As AI technologies have advanced, some corporations have explored the potential of integrating AI into boardrooms. In these cases, AI systems act as advisory tools, helping human directors make informed decisions based on vast data sets, market trends, and predictive modelling. Notable Examples Rakuten’s AI Director One of the most publicized examples of AI participation in corporate governance comes from Japan’s e-commerce giant, Rakuten. In 2017, the company appointed an AI-powered entity, known as the ‘Robo-Director’, to advise its board. This robot uses machine learning and data analysis to provide strategic insights on business decisions. However, it was explicitly noted that Robo-Director does not have voting rights, but rather, it supports decision-making by analysing data. IBM’s Watson in Boardrooms IBM’s Watson, the company's advanced AI system, has also been used to assist businesses with decision-making. IBM Watson analyses data, helps executives to identify patterns, and provides predictive analysis that can influence business strategies. While Watson is not a director in the legal sense, it acts as a powerful tool for boards to consider during their deliberations. AI at Mitsubishi Corporation Mitsubishi Corporation, one of Japan's largest trading companies, has also experimented with AI in boardroom settings. In these cases, AI analyses large volumes of business data to assist executives and directors in making decisions that are not only financially sound but also aligned with the company's long-term strategy. Legal and Ethical Considerations While the use of AI and robotics in corporate governance is growing, several legal and ethical challenges exist, especially when it comes to allowing non-human entities to participate in decision-making processes. 1. Accountability and Responsibility: One of the major concerns with non-human directors is accountability. Traditional corporate governance is designed around human directors who can be held responsible for their actions. However, AI systems and robots cannot be held liable in the same way. This raises the question of who is responsible if a decision made with AI input leads to a corporate failure, regulatory violations, or financial losses. Should the responsibility fall to the human directors who rely on the AI’s insights, or should the AI itself bear some form of accountability, even though it lacks the capacity to be legally liable? 2. Ethical Issues and Bias in AI: AI systems can analyse vast amounts of data, but they can also inherit biases present in the data they are trained on. If these biases are not carefully monitored, AI could inadvertently make decisions that favour one group over another, leading to ethical dilemmas. For instance, an AI might recommend a cost-cutting strategy that disproportionately affects certain employee groups or customers, all based on data patterns that do not account for social responsibility or ethical considerations. The transparency of AI decision-making processes is also a concern. Unlike human directors who can explain the rationale behind their decisions, AI may function as a "black box," offering no clear insight into how it arrived at a conclusion. 3. Legal Frameworks and Recognition: Most legal frameworks around the world are built on the assumption that directors are human. As such, the concept of a non-human director challenges traditional corporate governance structures. In many jurisdictions, corporate law requires that a company’s board of directors be composed of individuals who are capable of fulfilling fiduciary duties—duties that AI systems cannot legally perform. Further, a non-human director to have formal voting rights, it would require significant changes to corporate law in many countries. Non-Human Directors: The Path Forward Despite the challenges, non-human directors may become more commonplace in the future, especially in advisory roles. Here are a few ways in which AI and robots could transform corporate boards: 1. AI as a Support Tool for Directors: Rather than replacing human directors, AI could serve as a sophisticated support tool, helping them make data-driven decisions. AI can process data faster and more comprehensively than humans, making it an invaluable asset in decision-making processes that require in-depth analysis, such as market trends, financial health, or risk assessments. By integrating AI, boards can leverage technology to enhance their decision-making. 2. Expanded Role in Risk Management: AI’s predictive capabilities can significantly improve risk management practices. Non-human systems can identify potential risks early, providing boards with the foresight needed to mitigate those risks before they escalate. For example, AI could predict market crashes, identify emerging threats to cybersecurity, or even help in crisis management, offering a robust layer of protection for organizations. 3. Hybrid Models of Governance: The future of corporate governance could involve hybrid models, where human directors work alongside AI systems. In such models, AI would be responsible for the heavy lifting of data analysis and decision support, while human directors would still exercise judgment, creativity, and ethical considerations. In these hybrid models, AI would complement human decision-making, not replace it entirely. Global Perspectives: AI and Non-Human Directors Globally, companies are experimenting with AI and robotics in governance to varying degrees. In Japan, the use of AI in advisory capacities is more common, as seen in Rakuten and Mitsubishi. In Europe and North America, the concept is still in its infancy, with companies focusing on the use of AI in operations, customer service, and finance rather than as formal board members. However, the rapid evolution of AI and its growing capabilities could make non-human directors a reality in the not-so-distant future. Conclusion Non-human directors are an exciting prospect in the evolving world of corporate governance. While AI and robotic systems have not yet taken the reins as formal directors, their potential to assist in decision-making is clear. Companies are increasingly relying on AI to process complex data, predict trends, and identify risks, enhancing their governance processes. However, for AI and robotics to become formal directors, substantial legal, ethical, and regulatory changes will need to occur. Accountability, transparency, and bias mitigation will be critical factors to address before non-human directors can be integrated into decision-making processes in a way that is both effective and ethical. The future may see AI and robotics becoming indispensable tools for governance, but the role of human judgment, creativity, and responsibility will remain crucial in steering corporate boards toward success. As the integration of technology into business continues to expand, the role of non-human directors will likely grow, reshaping the very nature of corporate governance as we know it. #robot #nonhumandirector #AI #AIasdirector #corporategovernance #boardmeeting